<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Iowa primary and two parties vs four</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anarchogeek.com/2008/01/04/the-iowa-primary-and-two-parties-vs-four/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anarchogeek.com/2008/01/04/the-iowa-primary-and-two-parties-vs-four/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 23:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Nil</title>
		<link>http://anarchogeek.com/2008/01/04/the-iowa-primary-and-two-parties-vs-four/comment-page-1/#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Nil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchogeek.com/2008/01/04/the-iowa-primary-and-two-parties-vs-four#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting to me that you assumed Obama was a &#8216;centrist&#8217;.  I don&#8217;t pay that much attention to the electioneering, but must mean he&#8217;s running that way. Having lived in Chicago for 7 years, I had assumed that Obama was super progressive. Despite running against Bobby Rush, that&#8217;s his reputation among white politicos in Chicago.   I was actually surprised to take a look at his positions and find he wasn&#8217;t quite so &#8216;progressive&#8217; as I had assumed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to me that you assumed Obama was a &#8216;centrist&#8217;.  I don&#8217;t pay that much attention to the electioneering, but must mean he&#8217;s running that way. Having lived in Chicago for 7 years, I had assumed that Obama was super progressive. Despite running against Bobby Rush, that&#8217;s his reputation among white politicos in Chicago.   I was actually surprised to take a look at his positions and find he wasn&#8217;t quite so &#8216;progressive&#8217; as I had assumed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://anarchogeek.com/2008/01/04/the-iowa-primary-and-two-parties-vs-four/comment-page-1/#comment-1622</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchogeek.com/2008/01/04/the-iowa-primary-and-two-parties-vs-four#comment-1622</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#8217;s a certain historical antecedent to Huckabee, William Jennings Bryan. While certainly not a socialist or republican, Bryan was a religious conservative running for president (as a democrat) with a somewhat liberal economic position (and critical corporate bent). Like Huckabee, he did not believe in evolution (in fact he was involved in a court case trying to rid a Tennessee school of evolution).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a certain historical antecedent to Huckabee, William Jennings Bryan. While certainly not a socialist or republican, Bryan was a religious conservative running for president (as a democrat) with a somewhat liberal economic position (and critical corporate bent). Like Huckabee, he did not believe in evolution (in fact he was involved in a court case trying to rid a Tennessee school of evolution).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

